| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Shorty Dangerous

Joined: 12 Sep 2007 Posts: 22 Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:16 pm Post subject: Ultimate Barrel Length |
|
|
It struck me that if a barrel can be too short to get the most out of a given round and can also be too long, there must be an optimum barrel length for a given round. Is that easily ascertainable? Ma Deuce's use a 45" barrel but none of the 50BMG rifles are anywhere close to that. _________________ There are three kinds of people, those who can count and those who can't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hawaii five-0 Too much time on my hands
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 85 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Everything is a compromise in manufacturing.Trying to find the formula for a product that fits as many needs as possible,for as cheap as possible.The barrel compromise is velocity increase-vs-practical weight. _________________ Club Serbu member#1201 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
markserbu Guru

Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 687 Location: Tampa, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:48 am Post subject: Re: Ultimate Barrel Length |
|
|
A rule of thumb that I read in some book long ago was that the barrel length should be 90 diameters long. The original M-16 barrel length was 20" and .223x90=20.07. Obviously .50x90=45, which is the M2 barrel length. So it seems to check out. What's funny is that if you run numbers in interior ballistics programs you'll find that 99% of the powder is burned well before 90 diameters.
| Shorty wrote: | | It struck me that if a barrel can be too short to get the most out of a given round and can also be too long, there must be an optimum barrel length for a given round. Is that easily ascertainable? Ma Deuce's use a 45" barrel but none of the 50BMG rifles are anywhere close to that. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shorty Dangerous

Joined: 12 Sep 2007 Posts: 22 Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Mark. I became curious when looking at the Remington web site where I saw .308 rifles with 20", 24", 26" and 27.25" barrels. This made me wonder how you'd determine which would be best. The 45" M2 barrel also came to mind.
Once the powder is fully burned, isn't any remaining barrel slowing the bullet down unnecessarily? Mark, you once mentioned that you sell 25 times as many standard barrels as the longer ones. Is there much difference in performance? Have you experimented with even longer barrels? Thanks. _________________ There are three kinds of people, those who can count and those who can't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eldon-1076 Too much time on my hands

Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 97 Location: TN
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like this topic When I bought my BFG, I wondered too about the 29 inch barrel vs. the 36 inch. I went with the 29" because I didn't think it would matter much, and it came with a case big enough to fit.
What about barrel length with the DTC rounds>? how would it effect those? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hawaii five-0 Too much time on my hands
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 85 Location: California
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The DTC is pretty much the same as BMG.The same projectile is used.And the same amount of powder.The volume of the DTC case is actually slightly more than the BMG,not less. _________________ Club Serbu member#1201 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eldon-1076 Too much time on my hands

Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 97 Location: TN
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark! can I get a Serbu BFG snub nose for conceal-carry??? LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|